Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsSigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification

See exactly how AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
41
Gaps Found
2%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification with 2% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 41 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Performance Evaluation and Improvement (Clauses 9-10)(1 mappings)

9.1Risk communication and consultation
SIGSTORE-3Sigstore for Containers and Artifacts (Cosign)

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Other Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification?

AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 42 controls across its framework, while Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification covers 4 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation, where 13 AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification?

Of 42 total AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 1 map directly to Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification?

41 AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and Sigstore - Software Artifact Signing and Verification?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.