Cross-Framework Mapping

Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015)vsWCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)

See exactly how Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015) controls map to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015) maps to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) with 13% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 23 Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015) controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter 1: General Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 23 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Chapter 3: Special Categories of Data(2 mappings)

AM-DPA-10Article 12 — Biometric Personal Data
CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security
AM-DPA-9Article 11 — Special Category Personal Data
CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security

Chapter 5: Obligations of Controllers and Processors(1 mappings)

AM-DPA-15Article 19 — Cross-Border Data Transfer
WCO-SAFE-AF-02Mutual Recognition

Related Comparisons

Other Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015) comparisons

Other WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015) and WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015) has 23 controls across its framework, while WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter 1: General Provisions, where 8 Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015) controls have no direct WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) equivalent.

How many controls map between Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015) and WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

Of 23 total Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015) controls, 3 map directly to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021) controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015) to WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

20 Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015) controls have no direct equivalent in WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter 1: General Provisions with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015) and WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade (2021)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter 1: General Provisions (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.