TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Argyris Double-Loop LearningvsCOSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)

See exactly how Argyris Double-Loop Learning controls map to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
42%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Argyris Double-Loop Learning maps to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) with 42% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 Argyris Double-Loop Learning controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Defensive Routines and Learning.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Learning Loops(1 mappings)

ARGYRIS-DLDouble-Loop Learning — questioning and modifying underlying assumptions, values, and policies
→COSO-IC-CE-01The organization demonstrates commitment to integrity and ethical values

Defensive Routines and Learning(2 mappings)

ARGYRIS-DROrganizational Defensive Routines — actions preventing embarrassment or threat that also prevent learning
→COSO-IC-RA-06The organization specifies objectives with sufficient clarity for risk identification and assessment
ARGYRIS-PICProductive Inquiry and Conversation — creating conditions for honest dialogue without defensiveness
→COSO-IC-IC-14The organization internally communicates information including internal control objectives

Theories of Action(2 mappings)

ARGYRIS-M1Model I Behavior — unilateral control, win-lose framing, suppression of negative feelings, defensiveness
→COSO-IC-CE-02The board demonstrates independence from management and exercises oversight of internal control
ARGYRIS-TUTheory-in-Use — the theory of action actually governing behavior, often unconscious and different from espoused
→COSO-IC-CE-02The board demonstrates independence from management and exercises oversight of internal control

Related Comparisons

Other Argyris Double-Loop Learning comparisons

Argyris Double-Loop Learning vs LEADS in a Caring Environment8 mappingsArgyris Double-Loop Learning vs The Leadership Challenge (Kouzes & Posner)6 mappingsArgyris Double-Loop Learning vs OECD/G20 Principles of Corporate Governance6 mappingsArgyris Double-Loop Learning vs NHS Healthcare Leadership Model6 mappingsArgyris Double-Loop Learning vs ISO 37000:20216 mappingsArgyris Double-Loop Learning vs Goleman Emotional Intelligence Leadership Framework6 mappingsArgyris Double-Loop Learning vs ICN Leadership for Change Programme5 mappingsArgyris Double-Loop Learning vs Senge Fifth Discipline — Learning Organization5 mappings

Other COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) comparisons

ILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)6 mappingsSASB Standards (ISSB Integrated) vs COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)6 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)6 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)6 mappingsThe Leadership Challenge (Kouzes & Posner) vs COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)5 mappingsICN Leadership for Change Programme vs COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)5 mappingsSSAE 18 — Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)5 mappingsPCAOB AS 2201 — Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) vs COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Argyris Double-Loop Learning and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?

Argyris Double-Loop Learning has 12 controls across its framework, while COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (42% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Defensive Routines and Learning, where 3 Argyris Double-Loop Learning controls have no direct COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) equivalent.

How many controls map between Argyris Double-Loop Learning and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?

Of 12 total Argyris Double-Loop Learning controls, 5 map directly to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) controls — representing 42% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Argyris Double-Loop Learning to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?

7 Argyris Double-Loop Learning controls have no direct equivalent in COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). The highest concentration of gaps is in Defensive Routines and Learning with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Argyris Double-Loop Learning and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Defensive Routines and Learning (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.