TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 234vsLaos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)

See exactly how APRA CPS 234 controls map to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 234 maps to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) with 11% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 APRA CPS 234 controls identifies 38 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls(1 mappings)

CPS234-06Network security and segmentation
→LAOS-CC-Network-Security-Information-Security-Obligations-Article-21-Service-Provider-DutiesLaos Cybercrime Network Security + Information Security Obligations + Article 21 + Service Provider Duties

Controls(1 mappings)

CPS234-21Implementation of Controls
→LAOS-CC-LaoCERT-Incident-Response-National-Cybersecurity-Coordination-Article-22Laos Cybercrime LaoCERT + Incident Response + National Cybersecurity Coordination + Article 22

APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting(3 mappings)

CPS234-21Implementation of Controls
→LAOS-CC-LaoCERT-Incident-Response-National-Cybersecurity-Coordination-Article-22Laos Cybercrime LaoCERT + Incident Response + National Cybersecurity Coordination + Article 22
CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing
→LAOS-CC-LaoCERT-Incident-Response-National-Cybersecurity-Coordination-Article-22Laos Cybercrime LaoCERT + Incident Response + National Cybersecurity Coordination + Article 22
CPS234-25Internal Audit of Information Security
→LAOS-CC-LaoCERT-Incident-Response-National-Cybersecurity-Coordination-Article-22Laos Cybercrime LaoCERT + Incident Response + National Cybersecurity Coordination + Article 22

Assurance(1 mappings)

CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing
→LAOS-CC-LaoCERT-Incident-Response-National-Cybersecurity-Coordination-Article-22Laos Cybercrime LaoCERT + Incident Response + National Cybersecurity Coordination + Article 22

Audit(1 mappings)

CPS234-25Internal Audit of Information Security
→LAOS-CC-LaoCERT-Incident-Response-National-Cybersecurity-Coordination-Article-22Laos Cybercrime LaoCERT + Incident Response + National Cybersecurity Coordination + Article 22

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 234 comparisons

APRA CPS 234 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 525 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs PSD2 SCA16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs OSFI B-1316 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs Open Banking Security16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs HKMA SPM16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs GLBA16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs PCI SSF16 mappings

Other Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) comparisons

ISO 27018 vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappingsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappingsIEC 62443 vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappingsAPI 1164 vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappingsISO 27017 vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 234 and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

APRA CPS 234 has 35 controls across its framework, while Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management, where 5 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 234 and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

Of 35 total APRA CPS 234 controls, 7 map directly to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 234 to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

38 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct equivalent in Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015). The highest concentration of gaps is in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 234 and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

The domain with the highest gap count is APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.