Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 234vsISO 20000-1

See exactly how APRA CPS 234 controls map to ISO 20000-1. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
31%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 234 maps to ISO 20000-1 with 31% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 APRA CPS 234 controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls(2 mappings)

CPS234-09Encryption and key management
9.1Risk communication and consultation
CPS234-10Secure configuration standards
ISO20000-10Configuration management

APRA CPS 234: Operational Resilience(3 mappings)

CPS234-11Business continuity planning and testing
ISO20000-03Capacity and availability management
CPS234-14Roles and Responsibilities
ISO20000-03Capacity and availability management
CPS234-15Information Security Capability
ISO20000-03Capacity and availability management

Governance(1 mappings)

CPS234-14Roles and Responsibilities
ISO20000-03Capacity and availability management

Capability(1 mappings)

CPS234-15Information Security Capability
ISO20000-03Capacity and availability management

Controls(1 mappings)

CPS234-21Implementation of Controls
ISO20000-11Incident management

APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting(3 mappings)

CPS234-21Implementation of Controls
ISO20000-11Incident management
CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing
ISO20000-11Incident management
CPS234-25Internal Audit of Information Security
ISO20000-11Incident management

Assurance(1 mappings)

CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing
ISO20000-11Incident management

Audit(1 mappings)

CPS234-25Internal Audit of Information Security
ISO20000-11Incident management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 234 and ISO 20000-1?

APRA CPS 234 has 35 controls across its framework, while ISO 20000-1 covers 51 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management, where 5 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct ISO 20000-1 equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 234 and ISO 20000-1?

Of 35 total APRA CPS 234 controls, 13 map directly to ISO 20000-1 controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 234 to ISO 20000-1?

32 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 20000-1. The highest concentration of gaps is in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 234 and ISO 20000-1?

The domain with the highest gap count is APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.