Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsISO/IEC 23894:2023

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to ISO/IEC 23894:2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
32
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 with 13% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 49 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Business Continuity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 503K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 503K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.

Operational Risk Management Framework(6 mappings)

CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment3 targets
ISO23894-6.3AI Risk Assessment
ISO23894-6.3.1AI Risk Identification
ISO23894-6.3.3AI Risk Evaluation
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review3 targets
ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation

Operations(1 mappings)

CPS230-27Incident Management
ISO23894-A.6AI System Security

Business Continuity(1 mappings)

CPS230-27Incident Management
ISO23894-A.6AI System Security

Service Provider Management(7 mappings)

CPS230-37Service Provider Management Policy3 targets
ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation
CPS230-46Ongoing Risk Management3 targets
ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation
CPS230-49Internal Audit of Service Providers
ISO23894-A.6AI System Security

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 23894:2023 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 730 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (503K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 47 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 23894:2023 covers 56 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Business Continuity, where 11 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct ISO/IEC 23894:2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

Of 47 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 7 map directly to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 49 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

49 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 23894:2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in Business Continuity with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is Business Continuity (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.