TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 220 Risk ManagementvsEN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)

See exactly how APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls map to EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 220 Risk Management maps to EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) with 12% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Governance and Oversight.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Assessment and Reporting(2 mappings)

CPS220-RAR-1Material Risk Identification2 targets
→EN50126-3Risk Analysis and Evaluation
→EN50129-4Safety Integrity Level Allocation

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 220 Risk Management comparisons

APRA CPS 220 Risk Management vs China AI Regulations4 mappingsAPRA CPS 220 Risk Management vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)4 mappingsAPRA CPS 220 Risk Management vs NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile4 mappingsAPRA CPS 220 Risk Management vs C2M24 mappingsAPRA CPS 220 Risk Management vs CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)4 mappingsAPRA CPS 220 Risk Management vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice4 mappingsAPRA CPS 220 Risk Management vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation4 mappingsAPRA CPS 220 Risk Management vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)4 mappings

Other EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) comparisons

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappingsUS OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappingsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappingsISO/IEC 27557:2022 — Organisational Privacy Risk Management vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappingsCIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) vs EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 220 Risk Management and EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)?

APRA CPS 220 Risk Management has 8 controls across its framework, while EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Governance and Oversight, where 4 APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls have no direct EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 220 Risk Management and EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)?

Of 8 total APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls, 1 map directly to EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 220 Risk Management to EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)?

7 APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Governance and Oversight with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 220 Risk Management and EN 50126, EN 50128, and EN 50129 — Railway Applications - Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Governance and Oversight (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.