Cross-Framework Mapping

API 1164vsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity

See exactly how API 1164 controls map to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

API 1164 maps to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity with 25% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 API 1164 controls identifies 18 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in API 1164: Access Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

API 1164: Systems Security(2 mappings)

API1164-13Business Continuity and Recovery
RG5.71-C.7Continuous Monitoring
API1164-14Physical Security
RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management

API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery(6 mappings)

API1164-17Wireless and Field Communications2 targets
RG5.71-C.4Incident Response Plan
RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
API1164-18Field Device Security2 targets
RG5.71-C.4Incident Response Plan
RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration
API1164-19Safety Instrumented Systems Interface2 targets
RG5.71-C.4Incident Response Plan
RG5.71-C.5Recovery and Restoration

API 1164: Supply Chain & Configuration(1 mappings)

API1164-22Configuration management for OT systems
RG5.71-C.6Configuration Management
Coverage crosswalk

A API 1164 to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls your existing API 1164 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

API 1164 into NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity into API 1164
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

API 1164 to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 25% in the header counts how many API 1164 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between API 1164 and NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity?

API 1164 has 24 controls across its framework, while NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in API 1164: Access Management, where 5 API 1164 controls have no direct NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity equivalent.

How many controls map between API 1164 and NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity?

Of 24 total API 1164 controls, 6 map directly to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls, representing 25% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping API 1164 to NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity?

18 API 1164 controls have no direct equivalent in NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity. The highest concentration of gaps is in API 1164: Access Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between API 1164 and NRC 10 CFR 73.54 - Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity?

The domain with the highest gap count is API 1164: Access Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.