TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

API 1164vsFBI CJIS Security Policy

See exactly how API 1164 controls map to FBI CJIS Security Policy. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

API 1164 maps to FBI CJIS Security Policy with 38% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 API 1164 controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

API 1164: Access Management(10 mappings)

API1164-06Physical and logical access controls3 targets
→ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
→ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
→NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
API1164-07Personnel risk assessment4 targets
→CJIS-17Risk Assessment
→ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
→ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
→NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
API1164-09Interactive remote access security3 targets
→ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
→ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
→NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy

API 1164: Systems Security(2 mappings)

API1164-12Malware prevention for operational systems
→CJIS-10System and Information Integrity
API1164-14System security hardening
→CJIS-7Configuration Management

API 1164: Supply Chain & Configuration(5 mappings)

API1164-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
→CJIS-19Supply Chain Risk Management
API1164-22Configuration management for OT systems2 targets
→CJIS-19Supply Chain Risk Management
→CJIS-7Configuration Management
API1164-23Change management procedures
→CJIS-19Supply Chain Risk Management
API1164-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
→CJIS-17Risk Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other API 1164 comparisons

API 1164 vs NIST SP 1800-3216 mappingsAPI 1164 vs ISO 2701916 mappingsAPI 1164 vs DO-326A / ED-202A16 mappingsAPI 1164 vs BIMCO Cyber Security16 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IEC 6244316 mappingsAPI 1164 vs NIS2 Directive16 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IEEE 168616 mappingsAPI 1164 vs C2M216 mappings

Other FBI CJIS Security Policy comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FBI CJIS Security Policy18 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs FBI CJIS Security Policy17 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs FBI CJIS Security Policy17 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs FBI CJIS Security Policy17 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FBI CJIS Security Policy17 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs FBI CJIS Security Policy17 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs FBI CJIS Security Policy17 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs FBI CJIS Security Policy17 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between API 1164 and FBI CJIS Security Policy?

API 1164 has 24 controls across its framework, while FBI CJIS Security Policy covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery, where 5 API 1164 controls have no direct FBI CJIS Security Policy equivalent.

How many controls map between API 1164 and FBI CJIS Security Policy?

Of 24 total API 1164 controls, 9 map directly to FBI CJIS Security Policy controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping API 1164 to FBI CJIS Security Policy?

15 API 1164 controls have no direct equivalent in FBI CJIS Security Policy. The highest concentration of gaps is in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between API 1164 and FBI CJIS Security Policy?

The domain with the highest gap count is API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.