Cross-Framework Mapping

API 1164vsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how API 1164 controls map to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

API 1164 maps to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 25% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 API 1164 controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

API 1164: Access Management(1 mappings)

API1164-07Personnel risk assessment
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment

API 1164: Systems Security(1 mappings)

API1164-14System security hardening
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control

API 1164: Supply Chain & Configuration(10 mappings)

API1164-21Supply chain risk management for critical components4 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, and Services
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment
API1164-22Configuration management for OT systems3 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, and Services
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
API1164-23Change management procedures2 targets
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, and Services
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
API1164-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment

Related Comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between API 1164 and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

API 1164 has 24 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery, where 5 API 1164 controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between API 1164 and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 24 total API 1164 controls, 6 map directly to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping API 1164 to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

18 API 1164 controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between API 1164 and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.