Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11)vsSweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)
See exactly how Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls map to Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) maps to Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) with 45% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter I: General Provisions.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 35 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Chapter I: General Provisions(5 mappings)
Chapter IV: Controller and Processor Obligations(10 mappings)
Chapter VI: Data Protection Agency (APD)(5 mappings)
+15 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) comparisons
Other Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)?
Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) has 31 controls across its framework, while Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter I: General Provisions, where 6 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls have no direct Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) equivalent.
How many controls map between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)?
Of 31 total Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls, 14 map directly to Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) to Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)?
17 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls have no direct equivalent in Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter I: General Provisions with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter I: General Provisions (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.