Cross-Framework Mapping

US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data SecurityvsSweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)

See exactly how US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls map to Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
33
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security maps to Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) with 15% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Compliance and Enforcement(5 mappings)

EU-NIS2-EN-CE-01Supervisory Framework2 targets
SWE-11Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
SWE-12Investigatory Powers
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting
SWE-14Sanctions Framework
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties
SWE-14Sanctions Framework
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
SWE-2Relationship to GDPR

Data Security Requirements(3 mappings)

US-ITAR-EAR-DS-01Technical Data Protection2 targets
SWE-1Scope and Purpose
SWE-2Relationship to GDPR
US-ITAR-EAR-DS-03Access Controls
SWE-14Sanctions Framework

Related Comparisons

Other US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security comparisons

Other Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security and Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)?

US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security has 41 controls across its framework, while Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 34 US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls have no direct Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) equivalent.

How many controls map between US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security and Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)?

Of 41 total US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls, 6 map directly to Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security to Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)?

35 US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls have no direct equivalent in Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218). The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 34 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security and Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (34 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.