Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11)vsSOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination
See exactly how Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls map to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) maps to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination with 35% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter I: General Provisions.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Chapter IV: Controller and Processor Obligations(4 mappings)
Chapter VI: Data Protection Agency (APD)(1 mappings)
Chapter VII: Sanctions and Penalties(2 mappings)
Chapter III: Rights of Data Subjects(3 mappings)
Chapter I: General Provisions(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) comparisons
Other SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?
Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) has 31 controls across its framework, while SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter I: General Provisions, where 8 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls have no direct SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination equivalent.
How many controls map between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?
Of 31 total Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls, 11 map directly to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?
20 Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) controls have no direct equivalent in SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter I: General Provisions with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) and SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?
The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter I: General Provisions (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.