Cross-Framework Mapping

AICPA SOC 1vsNetherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018)

See exactly how AICPA SOC 1 controls map to Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AICPA SOC 1 maps to Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018) with 4% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AICPA SOC 1 controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AICPA SOC 1: Incident Management & Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AICPA SOC 1: Information Security Governance(5 mappings)

SOC1-05Roles and responsibilities definition5 targets
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 4Participating Institutions
Art. 41Exemptions from Certain GDPR Provisions
Sec. 2Interpretation
Sec. 3Scope and Application

Related Comparisons

Other AICPA SOC 1 comparisons

Other Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AICPA SOC 1 and Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018)?

AICPA SOC 1 has 25 controls across its framework, while Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018) covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AICPA SOC 1: Incident Management & Reporting, where 5 AICPA SOC 1 controls have no direct Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between AICPA SOC 1 and Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018)?

Of 25 total AICPA SOC 1 controls, 1 map directly to Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018) controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AICPA SOC 1 to Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018)?

24 AICPA SOC 1 controls have no direct equivalent in Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in AICPA SOC 1: Incident Management & Reporting with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AICPA SOC 1 and Netherlands GDPR Implementation Act (UAVG — Uitvoeringswet AVG, 2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AICPA SOC 1: Incident Management & Reporting (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.