Cross-Framework Mapping

AICPA SOC 1vsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how AICPA SOC 1 controls map to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AICPA SOC 1 maps to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 36% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AICPA SOC 1 controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AICPA SOC 1: Third-Party Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AICPA SOC 1: Cybersecurity Controls(2 mappings)

SOC1-08Application security controls
FTC-314.4c4Secure Development Practices
SOC1-09Encryption and key management
FTC-314.4c3Encryption

AICPA SOC 1: Operational Resilience(8 mappings)

SOC1-11Business continuity planning and testing2 targets
FTC-314.4bWritten Risk Assessment
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
SOC1-12Disaster recovery procedures2 targets
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
SOC1-13Third-party dependency management2 targets
FTC-314.4bWritten Risk Assessment
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
SOC1-15Communication and escalation procedures2 targets
FTC-314.4bWritten Risk Assessment
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery

AICPA SOC 1: Incident Management & Reporting(9 mappings)

SOC1-21Incident detection and classification3 targets
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
SOC1-23Regulatory reporting requirements3 targets
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
SOC1-24Customer notification procedures3 targets
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AICPA SOC 1 and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

AICPA SOC 1 has 25 controls across its framework, while FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AICPA SOC 1: Third-Party Risk Management, where 5 AICPA SOC 1 controls have no direct FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between AICPA SOC 1 and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 25 total AICPA SOC 1 controls, 9 map directly to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AICPA SOC 1 to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

16 AICPA SOC 1 controls have no direct equivalent in FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in AICPA SOC 1: Third-Party Risk Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AICPA SOC 1 and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AICPA SOC 1: Third-Party Risk Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.