TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AICPA SOC 1vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how AICPA SOC 1 controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AICPA SOC 1 maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 40% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AICPA SOC 1 controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AICPA SOC 1: Third-Party Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AICPA SOC 1: Information Security Governance(2 mappings)

SOC1-05Roles and responsibilities definition2 targets
→Sec. 314.2(a)Definition of financial institution
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information

AICPA SOC 1: Cybersecurity Controls(2 mappings)

SOC1-08Application security controls
→Sec. 314.4(c)(4)Secure development practices
SOC1-09Encryption and key management
→Sec. 314.4(c)(3)Encryption of customer information

AICPA SOC 1: Operational Resilience(5 mappings)

SOC1-11Business continuity planning and testing
→LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
SOC1-12Disaster recovery procedures2 targets
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
SOC1-13Third-party dependency management
→LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
SOC1-15Communication and escalation procedures
→LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery

AICPA SOC 1: Incident Management & Reporting(9 mappings)

SOC1-21Incident detection and classification3 targets
→FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
SOC1-23Regulatory reporting requirements3 targets
→FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
SOC1-24Customer notification procedures3 targets
→FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan

Related Comparisons

Other AICPA SOC 1 comparisons

AICPA SOC 1 vs APRA CPS 23416 mappingsAICPA SOC 1 vs Open Banking Security16 mappingsAICPA SOC 1 vs HKMA SPM16 mappingsAICPA SOC 1 vs PCI SSF16 mappingsAICPA SOC 1 vs PCI P2PE16 mappingsAICPA SOC 1 vs PSD2 SCA16 mappingsAICPA SOC 1 vs FFIEC IT Examination Handbook16 mappingsAICPA SOC 1 vs BCBS 23916 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AICPA SOC 1 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

AICPA SOC 1 has 25 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AICPA SOC 1: Third-Party Risk Management, where 5 AICPA SOC 1 controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between AICPA SOC 1 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 25 total AICPA SOC 1 controls, 10 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AICPA SOC 1 to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

15 AICPA SOC 1 controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in AICPA SOC 1: Third-Party Risk Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AICPA SOC 1 and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AICPA SOC 1: Third-Party Risk Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.