Cross-Framework Mapping

African Union Malabo ConventionvsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers

See exactly how African Union Malabo Convention controls map to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

African Union Malabo Convention maps to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers with 10% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 30 African Union Malabo Convention controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cybercrime Offences.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 30 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Personal Data Protection — Rights and Obligations(1 mappings)

Art. 15Cybersecurity Requirements
A.4Supply Chain Risk Management

Cybersecurity Promotion(5 mappings)

Art. 25Criminal Penalties2 targets
B.2Data Protection and Encryption
D.1Incident Response Planning
Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing3 targets
A.1Governance Framework
A.3Asset Management
A.4Supply Chain Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other African Union Malabo Convention comparisons

Other UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between African Union Malabo Convention and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

African Union Malabo Convention has 30 controls across its framework, while UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cybercrime Offences, where 7 African Union Malabo Convention controls have no direct UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers equivalent.

How many controls map between African Union Malabo Convention and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

Of 30 total African Union Malabo Convention controls, 3 map directly to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping African Union Malabo Convention to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

27 African Union Malabo Convention controls have no direct equivalent in UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cybercrime Offences with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between African Union Malabo Convention and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cybercrime Offences (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.