TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

African Union Malabo ConventionvsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data

See exactly how African Union Malabo Convention controls map to Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

53
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

African Union Malabo Convention maps to Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data with 29% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 51 African Union Malabo Convention controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Implementation and Final Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 51 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 53 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.

Personal Data Protection - General Principles(14 mappings)

Art. 10Data and Data Governance
→CO-HDL-09Right to data portability
Art. 12Record-Keeping5 targets
→Art.6Processing of Sensitive Data
→Art.7Children's Data
→CO-HDL-06Right of access to personal data
→CO-HDL-08Right to erasure and deletion
→CO-HDL-09Right to data portability
Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements7 targets
→Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required
→Art.6Processing of Sensitive Data
→Art.7Children's Data
→Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
→CO-HDL-06Right of access to personal data
→CO-HDL-08Right to erasure and deletion
→CO-HDL-09Right to data portability
Art. 9Risk Management System
→CO-HDL-09Right to data portability

Personal Data Protection - Rights and Obligations(3 mappings)

Art. 16Obligations of Providers of High-Risk AI Systems3 targets
→CO-HDL-19Data protection officer designation
→CO-HDL-20Records of processing activities
→CO-HDL-24Cross-border transfer safeguards

Implementation and Final Provisions(3 mappings)

Art. 19Automatically Generated Logs3 targets
→Art.6Processing of Sensitive Data
→Art.7Children's Data
→CO-HDL-06Right of access to personal data

+33 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other African Union Malabo Convention comparisons

African Union Malabo Convention vs EU AI Act16 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience15 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs ILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977)14 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) - superseded by AMLD714 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs ISO 8000 - Data Quality14 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule14 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs Privacy by Design (PbD) - Seven Foundational Principles14 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs Turkey Personal Data Protection Law (KVKK - Law No. 6698)14 mappings

Other Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data comparisons

LGPD vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data20 mappingsSouth Korea PIPA vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data20 mappingsArgentina PDPA vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsAPPI vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsSwitzerland FADP vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappingsTexas Data Privacy Act vs Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 768 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between African Union Malabo Convention and Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data?

African Union Malabo Convention has 51 controls across its framework, while Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Implementation and Final Provisions, where 4 African Union Malabo Convention controls have no direct Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data equivalent.

How many controls map between African Union Malabo Convention and Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data?

Of 51 total African Union Malabo Convention controls, 15 map directly to Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping African Union Malabo Convention to Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data?

36 African Union Malabo Convention controls have no direct equivalent in Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data. The highest concentration of gaps is in Implementation and Final Provisions with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between African Union Malabo Convention and Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data?

The domain with the highest gap count is Implementation and Final Provisions (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.