Cross-Framework Mapping

African Union Malabo ConventionvsEU AI Act

See exactly how African Union Malabo Convention controls map to EU AI Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

68
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
31%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

African Union Malabo Convention maps to EU AI Act with 31% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 51 African Union Malabo Convention controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Implementation and Final Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 51 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 68 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.

Personal Data Protection - General Principles(15 mappings)

Art. 10Data and Data Governance
Art. 9Risk Management System
Art. 12Record-Keeping6 targets
Art. 19Automatically Generated Logs
Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
Art. 29Application of a Conformity Assessment Body for Notification
Art. 53Obligations for Providers of General-Purpose AI Models
Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements
EUAI-14Privacy protection in AI training data
Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements7 targets
Art. 12Record-Keeping
Art. 17Quality Management System
Art. 19Automatically Generated Logs
Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
Art. 29Application of a Conformity Assessment Body for Notification
Art. 53Obligations for Providers of General-Purpose AI Models
EUAI-14Privacy protection in AI training data
Art. 9Risk Management System
Art. 10Data and Data Governance

Personal Data Protection - Rights and Obligations(5 mappings)

Art. 15Accuracy, Robustness and Cybersecurity3 targets
EUAI-01AI risk identification and assessment
EUAI-02AI system categorization by risk level
EUAI-05Ongoing AI risk monitoring
Art. 16Obligations of Providers of High-Risk AI Systems2 targets
EUAI-11Training data quality and governance
EUAI-12Data bias assessment and mitigation

+48 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other African Union Malabo Convention comparisons

Other EU AI Act comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 768 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between African Union Malabo Convention and EU AI Act?

African Union Malabo Convention has 51 controls across its framework, while EU AI Act covers 53 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Implementation and Final Provisions, where 4 African Union Malabo Convention controls have no direct EU AI Act equivalent.

How many controls map between African Union Malabo Convention and EU AI Act?

Of 51 total African Union Malabo Convention controls, 16 map directly to EU AI Act controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping African Union Malabo Convention to EU AI Act?

35 African Union Malabo Convention controls have no direct equivalent in EU AI Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Implementation and Final Provisions with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between African Union Malabo Convention and EU AI Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is Implementation and Final Provisions (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.