TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

African Union Malabo ConventionvsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how African Union Malabo Convention controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

22
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

African Union Malabo Convention maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 33% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 30 African Union Malabo Convention controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cybercrime Offences.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 30 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Personal Data Protection — General Principles(5 mappings)

Art. 12Data Ownership2 targets
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
Art. 8Data Categories3 targets
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
→Sec. 314.2(a)Definition of financial institution
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information

Implementation and Final Provisions(4 mappings)

Art. 19Consent Management Controls2 targets
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
Art. 34Notification of Personal Information Breach2 targets
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information

Electronic Transactions(4 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition2 targets
→Sec. 314.2(a)Definition of financial institution
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
Art. 4Participating Institutions2 targets
→Sec. 314.2(a)Definition of financial institution
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information

Cybersecurity Promotion(4 mappings)

Art. 25Criminal Penalties2 targets
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
→Sec. 314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures
Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing2 targets
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information

Cybercrime Offences(3 mappings)

Art. 29Safety Measures2 targets
→NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
Art. 30Privacy Policy
→FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other African Union Malabo Convention comparisons

African Union Malabo Convention vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience15 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs ILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977)14 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673)14 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs ISO 8000 — Data Quality14 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule14 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles14 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)14 mappingsAfrican Union Malabo Convention vs Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018)14 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between African Union Malabo Convention and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

African Union Malabo Convention has 30 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cybercrime Offences, where 5 African Union Malabo Convention controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between African Union Malabo Convention and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 30 total African Union Malabo Convention controls, 10 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping African Union Malabo Convention to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

20 African Union Malabo Convention controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Cybercrime Offences with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between African Union Malabo Convention and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cybercrime Offences (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.