3GPP SecurityvsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems
See exactly how 3GPP Security controls map to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
3GPP Security maps to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems with 35% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 3GPP Security controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3GPP Security: Information Security Policies.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
3GPP Security: Asset Management(3 mappings)
3GPP Security: Access Control(4 mappings)
3GPP Security: Cryptography(2 mappings)
3GPP Security: Operations Security(4 mappings)
3GPP Security: Communications Security(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other 3GPP Security comparisons
Other IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between 3GPP Security and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
3GPP Security has 31 controls across its framework, while IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3GPP Security: Information Security Policies, where 5 3GPP Security controls have no direct IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems equivalent.
How many controls map between 3GPP Security and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
Of 31 total 3GPP Security controls, 11 map directly to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
20 3GPP Security controls have no direct equivalent in IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in 3GPP Security: Information Security Policies with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?
The domain with the highest gap count is 3GPP Security: Information Security Policies (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.