TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP SecurityvsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how 3GPP Security controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 35% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 3GPP Security controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3GPP Security: Communications Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

3GPP Security: Information Security Policies(2 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-04Roles and responsibilities definition2 targets
→Sec. 314.2(a)Definition of financial institution
→Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information

3GPP Security: Access Control(4 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-12User access management and provisioning
→Sec. 314.4(c)(1)Access controls
3GPP-SEC-13Authentication and password management2 targets
→Sec. 314.4(c)(1)Access controls
→Sec. 314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
3GPP-SEC-14Privileged access management
→Sec. 314.4(c)(1)Access controls

3GPP Security: Cryptography(4 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-17Encryption of data at rest
→Sec. 314.4(c)(3)Encryption of customer information
3GPP-SEC-18Encryption of data in transit
→Sec. 314.4(c)(3)Encryption of customer information
3GPP-SEC-19Certificate management
→Sec. 314.4(c)(3)Encryption of customer information
3GPP-SEC-20Key lifecycle management
→Sec. 314.4(c)(3)Encryption of customer information

3GPP Security: Operations Security(6 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-23Backup and recovery procedures2 targets
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
3GPP-SEC-24Logging and monitoring
→Sec. 314.4(c)(8)Monitoring and logging
3GPP-SEC-25Technical vulnerability management3 targets
→FTC-314.4hWritten Incident Response Plan
→LLOYDS-IR-02Lloyd's Incident Reporting
→Sec. 314.4(d)Regular testing and monitoring

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security comparisons

3GPP Security vs NIST SP 800-18316 mappings3GPP Security vs MITRE ATT&CK16 mappings3GPP Security vs OWASP SAMM16 mappings3GPP Security vs OWASP ASVS16 mappings3GPP Security vs PTES16 mappings3GPP Security vs NIST SP 800-13716 mappings3GPP Security vs NIST SP 800-15016 mappings3GPP Security vs OWASP MASVS16 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

3GPP Security has 31 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3GPP Security: Communications Security, where 5 3GPP Security controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 31 total 3GPP Security controls, 11 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

20 3GPP Security controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in 3GPP Security: Communications Security with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is 3GPP Security: Communications Security (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.