3GPP SecurityvsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0
See exactly how 3GPP Security controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
3GPP Security maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 48% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 3GPP Security controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3GPP Security: Communications Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
3GPP Security: Information Security Policies(1 mappings)
3GPP Security: Asset Management(6 mappings)
3GPP Security: Access Control(7 mappings)
3GPP Security: Cryptography(6 mappings)
+10 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other 3GPP Security comparisons
Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between 3GPP Security and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
3GPP Security has 31 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (48% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3GPP Security: Communications Security, where 4 3GPP Security controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between 3GPP Security and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
Of 31 total 3GPP Security controls, 15 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 48% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
16 3GPP Security controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in 3GPP Security: Communications Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is 3GPP Security: Communications Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.