TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)vsUS ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security

See exactly how 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls map to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

22
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
55%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) maps to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security with 55% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Architecture Overview.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Subscriber Privacy and Service Security(11 mappings)

6.12Subscription Identifier Privacy2 targets
→US-ITAR-EAR-DS-01Technical Data Protection
→US-ITAR-EAR-DS-02Cloud and Storage
A.1Governance Framework2 targets
→EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
→EUDR-CE-03Penalties
A.2Risk Assessment3 targets
→EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
→EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
→HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements
A.3Asset Management2 targets
→EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
→EUDR-CE-03Penalties
A.4Supply Chain Risk Management2 targets
→EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
→EUDR-CE-03Penalties

Authentication and Key Management(2 mappings)

6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy
→US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions
→US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting

Radio and Access Network Security(6 mappings)

6.6RRC and UP Ciphering and Integrity2 targets
→US-ITAR-EAR-DS-01Technical Data Protection
→US-ITAR-EAR-DS-02Cloud and Storage
6.7Security Key Establishment for Radio Bearers3 targets
→US-ITAR-EAR-DS-01Technical Data Protection
→US-ITAR-EAR-DS-02Cloud and Storage
→US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
6.9Handover Security
→US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting

Non-3GPP and Inter-Network Security(1 mappings)

9.1N32 Interface Security (PRINS/TLS)
→US-ITAR-EAR-DS-01Technical Data Protection

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202115 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappings

Other US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security comparisons

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security16 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security16 mappingsEAR — Export Administration Regulations vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security16 mappingsAustralia eSafety Commissioner — Online Safety Expectations for Industry vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security15 mappingsNIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security15 mappingsNotifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia) vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security15 mappingsFTC Health Breach Notification Rule vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security15 mappingsUS SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) has 22 controls across its framework, while US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (55% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Architecture Overview, where 4 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

Of 22 total 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls, 12 map directly to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls — representing 55% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

10 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct equivalent in US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Architecture Overview with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Architecture Overview (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.