TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)vsNATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels

See exactly how 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls map to NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) maps to NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels with 32% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Subscriber Privacy and Service Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Subscriber Privacy and Service Security(2 mappings)

6.12Subscription Identifier Privacy2 targets
→STANAG4774-3.2Label Integrity Protection
→STANAG4778-2.2Cryptographic Binding

Authentication and Key Management(6 mappings)

6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy3 targets
→STANAG4774-1.1Confidentiality Label Structure
→STANAG4778-2.1Metadata Binding Mechanism
→STANAG4778-2.4Binding Profiles
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions3 targets
→STANAG4774-1.1Confidentiality Label Structure
→STANAG4778-2.1Metadata Binding Mechanism
→STANAG4778-2.4Binding Profiles

Radio and Access Network Security(8 mappings)

6.7Security Key Establishment for Radio Bearers5 targets
→STANAG4774-1.1Confidentiality Label Structure
→STANAG4774-3.2Label Integrity Protection
→STANAG4778-2.1Metadata Binding Mechanism
→STANAG4778-2.2Cryptographic Binding
→STANAG4778-2.4Binding Profiles
6.9Handover Security3 targets
→STANAG4774-1.1Confidentiality Label Structure
→STANAG4778-2.1Metadata Binding Mechanism
→STANAG4778-2.4Binding Profiles

Non-3GPP and Inter-Network Security(4 mappings)

9.1N32 Interface Security (PRINS/TLS)2 targets
→STANAG4774-3.2Label Integrity Protection
→STANAG4778-2.2Cryptographic Binding
9.2Network Domain Security2 targets
→STANAG4774-1.1Confidentiality Label Structure
→STANAG4778-2.1Metadata Binding Mechanism

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202115 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappings

Other NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels comparisons

EAR — Export Administration Regulations vs NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels5 mappingsISO/IEC 27557:2022 — Organisational Privacy Risk Management vs NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels5 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 — Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels5 mappingsC5 (Germany) vs NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels5 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels5 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels5 mappingsPSD2 SCA vs NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels5 mappings3GPP Security vs NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels?

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) has 22 controls across its framework, while NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Subscriber Privacy and Service Security, where 4 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels?

Of 22 total 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls, 7 map directly to NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) to NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels?

15 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct equivalent in NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels. The highest concentration of gaps is in Subscriber Privacy and Service Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and NATO STANAG 4774/4778 — Confidentiality Metadata Labels?

The domain with the highest gap count is Subscriber Privacy and Service Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.