TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)vsLithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)

See exactly how 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls map to Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) maps to Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) with 36% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Architecture Overview.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Authentication and Key Management(4 mappings)

6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy2 targets
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions2 targets
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition

Radio and Access Network Security(4 mappings)

6.7Security Key Establishment for Radio Bearers2 targets
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition
6.9Handover Security2 targets
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition

Non-3GPP and Inter-Network Security(2 mappings)

9.2Network Domain Security2 targets
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition

Subscriber Privacy and Service Security(4 mappings)

A.1Governance Framework
→Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
A.3Asset Management
→Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
A.4Supply Chain Risk Management2 targets
→Art. 15Cybersecurity Requirements
→Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202115 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappings

Other Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) comparisons

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience vs Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)12 mappingsSouth Korea PIPA vs Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)12 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)11 mappingsArgentina PDPA vs Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)11 mappingsAPPI vs Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)11 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)11 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)11 mappingsISO 8000 — Data Quality vs Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)?

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) has 22 controls across its framework, while Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) covers 23 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Architecture Overview, where 4 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)?

Of 22 total 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls, 8 map directly to Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018) controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) to Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)?

14 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct equivalent in Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Architecture Overview with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and Lithuania Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data (2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Architecture Overview (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.