TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)vsISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM)

See exactly how 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls map to ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) maps to ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM) with 27% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Subscriber Privacy and Service Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Authentication and Key Management(6 mappings)

6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy3 targets
→ISO-19650-1-4Information management concepts
→ISO-19650-1-7Common Data Environment (CDE) concept
→ISO-19650-3-5.3Trigger events for information exchange
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions3 targets
→ISO-19650-1-4Information management concepts
→ISO-19650-1-7Common Data Environment (CDE) concept
→ISO-19650-3-5.3Trigger events for information exchange

Radio and Access Network Security(6 mappings)

6.7Security Key Establishment for Radio Bearers3 targets
→ISO-19650-1-4Information management concepts
→ISO-19650-1-7Common Data Environment (CDE) concept
→ISO-19650-3-5.3Trigger events for information exchange
6.9Handover Security3 targets
→ISO-19650-1-4Information management concepts
→ISO-19650-1-7Common Data Environment (CDE) concept
→ISO-19650-3-5.3Trigger events for information exchange

Non-3GPP and Inter-Network Security(3 mappings)

9.2Network Domain Security3 targets
→ISO-19650-1-4Information management concepts
→ISO-19650-1-7Common Data Environment (CDE) concept
→ISO-19650-3-5.3Trigger events for information exchange

Subscriber Privacy and Service Security(1 mappings)

A.3Asset Management
→ISO-19650-1-5Delivery team and task team concepts

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202115 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappings

Other ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM) comparisons

CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM)5 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM)5 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM)5 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM)5 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM)5 mappings3GPP Security vs ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM)5 mappingsETSI EN 303 645 vs ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM)5 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM)?

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) has 22 controls across its framework, while ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM) covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Subscriber Privacy and Service Security, where 4 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM) equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM)?

Of 22 total 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls, 6 map directly to ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM) controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) to ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM)?

16 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM). The highest concentration of gaps is in Subscriber Privacy and Service Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and ISO 19650 — Organisation and Digitisation of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works (BIM)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Subscriber Privacy and Service Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.