Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)vsUS ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security

See exactly how 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls map to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) maps to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security with 21% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security for Specific Services.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Authentication and Key Management(2 mappings)

6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting

Service Based Architecture Security(4 mappings)

TS33.501-13.1NF Registration and Discovery Security
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties
TS33.501-13.2Service Based Interface Security2 targets
US-ITAR-EAR-DS-01Technical Data Protection
US-ITAR-EAR-DS-02Cloud and Storage
TS33.501-13.4OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties

Security for NAS and AS Protocols(2 mappings)

TS33.501-6.6AS Security2 targets
US-ITAR-EAR-DS-01Technical Data Protection
US-ITAR-EAR-DS-02Cloud and Storage

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) comparisons

Other US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) has 28 controls across its framework, while US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security for Specific Services, where 4 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls have no direct US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

Of 28 total 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls, 6 map directly to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

22 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls have no direct equivalent in US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security for Specific Services with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security for Specific Services (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.