Before any export decision, work out which regime controls the article, software or technical data. Review the U.S. Munitions List first: an article is on the USML if it is enumerated in a category or caught by a catch-all paragraph that uses 'specially designed', in which case the 120.41 release tests decide whether it escapes; an enumerated entry wins over a catch-all, and a USML article stays ITAR-controlled after it is built into a non-USML item unless the ITAR says otherwise (120.11(c)). Only if the item is not on the USML does it fall to the EAR, where the CCL order of review in Supplement No. 4 to Part 774 applies (600-series and 9x515 entries before the rest of the CCL, EAR99 last). Technical data and technology follow the item they relate to, so the classification of the data set is driven by the hardware or software it describes.
This control maps to 7 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 7 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.