Most bodies will find that the emissions they report under this guidance are the same as those in their commitment returns. The exception is a body whose operations give rise to material Scope 1, 2 or 3 emissions in places or categories the commitments do not measure. Two examples are fugitive releases beyond refrigeration and air conditioning (leaks from joints, seals, packing and gaskets, coal piles, wastewater treatment, pits, cooling towers, gas processing), which should be calculated with widely recognised independent standards, and emissions from overseas operations. Such a body shall disclose the extra GHG emissions that the commitment framework does not collect, keeping them disaggregated from the Scope 1 and Scope 2 totals that are measured against commitment targets, so that readers can understand them without losing sight of commitment performance; the disclosure may sit with the other emissions information or in a separate note. Where no factor or method exists, a widely recognised independent standard should be used: the GHG Protocol, ISO 14064, the former Climate Disclosure Standards Board material now within the ISSB, or the GRI sustainability reporting guidelines.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.