Mandatory Criterion 3 - Modern Slavery Risks - Australia MSA 2018
Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-3-Modern-Slavery-Risks-Operations-Supply-Chain-Section-16-1c-Sector-Geographic-Indicators: Australia MSA Mandatory Criterion 3 + Modern Slavery Risks + Section 16(1)(c) + Sector + Geographic Indicators
Address Mandatory Criterion 3 of Modern Slavery Statement under Section 16(1)(c) - describe risks of modern slavery practices in operations and supply chains of reporting entity + entities owned or controlled by reporting entity. Risk identification methodology including: country-level risk indicators (Global Slavery Index + Walk Free Foundation + ILO Forced Labour Index + USDOL List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor + TIP Report State Department Trafficking in Persons Report) + sector-level risk (high-risk sectors include textile + apparel + footwear + electronics + agriculture/horticulture + fishing + mining + construction + cleaning + hospitality + healthcare + transport + warehousing + ICT manufacturing) + product-level risk (cocoa + cotton + coffee + tea + sugar + tobacco + tin + tantalum + tungsten + gold + palm oil + seafood + bricks + carpets + electronics + apparel + leather) + workforce-level risk (migrant workers + recruitment fee debt + visa-tied workers + cash-economy + isolated workplaces + women + children). Department of Home Affairs Sector-Specific Guidance for: Healthcare + Retail + Construction + Agriculture + Cleaning + Hospitality + ICT + Migrant Worker Risk. Integration with COSO ERM + ISO 31000 + due diligence frameworks (UNGPs + OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct + OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises + Sector-Specific Due Diligence Guidance for Minerals Garments and Footwear Agriculture etc).
Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk·Verified against the published standard ·Control text last updated
What else in your programme already covers this
This control maps to 64 controls across 41 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.