The SRS defines the product's relationship to other related products; where the product forms part of a bigger system, it relates the larger system's requirements to the product's functionality and identifies the interfaces between them, ideally with a block diagram. It describes how the software operates within its constraints: each system interface and the software functionality meeting the system requirement (9.6.4.1); the logical characteristics of each user interface, possibly via a style guide (9.6.4.2); the logical characteristics of each hardware interface, including configuration, supported devices and protocols (9.6.4.3); each required software product by name, mnemonic, specification number, version and source, and for each interface its purpose and message content and format, or a reference to the document defining it (9.6.4.4); communications interfaces, for example network protocols on site (9.6.4.5); memory characteristics and limits (9.6.4.6); normal and special operations, including user-initiated modes, interactive and unattended periods, data processing support and backup and recovery (9.6.4.7); site adaptation requirements, meaning site-, mission- or mode-specific data or initialization sequences and the features to modify for a particular installation (9.6.4.8); and interactions with services such as software as a service or cloud services (9.6.4.9).
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.