Guidance: those managing the programme should determine its extent, which can vary with the auditee's context and can be a single audit for a small organization or project. Factors include the objective, scope, duration and number of audits and their reporting and follow-up; the standards and criteria; how many activities there are, and their importance, complexity, similarity and location; factors influencing system effectiveness; applicable criteria including planned arrangements, statutory, regulatory and other requirements; previous audit and review results; previous programme reviews; language, cultural and social issues; interested party concerns such as complaints, non-compliance and supply chain issues; significant changes to context or operations; availability of ICT and remote audit methods; events inside or outside the organization, for example nonconformities, security leaks, safety incidents, criminal acts and environmental incidents; and business risks and opportunities.
This control maps to 13 controls across 11 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 13 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.