The organization settles and approves how it will communicate and consult in support of the framework (ISO 31000:2018, 5.4.5). For AI that approach has to reach the extra stakeholders AI brings in, such as data subjects and people subject to automated decisions, convey the organization's responsible-AI policies and commitments, and collect those people's views on harms, benefits and the oversight they expect.
This control maps to 4 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 4 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.