Providers must keep at the disposal of the national competent authorities, for ten years from the date the high-risk AI system was placed on the market or put into service, the Art.11 technical documentation, the documentation concerning the Art.17 quality management system, documentation of changes approved by notified bodies, the decisions and other documents issued by notified bodies, and the Art.47 EU declaration of conformity. Providers that are financial institutions maintain the technical documentation within the documentation kept under Union financial services law.
This control maps to 10 controls across 7 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
EU AI Act EUAI-Art.18 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 10 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.