Cross-Framework Mapping

Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14)vsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)

See exactly how Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) controls map to Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

26
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
39%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) maps to Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) with 39% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter I — General Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Chapter I — General Provisions(11 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition3 targets
CDR-1Consumer Consent Framework
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
Art. 4Participating Institutions
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
Art.2Definitions
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
Art.8Prohibited Acts
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
HUN-2Definitions2 targets
CDR-11Data Minimization
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal
HUN-3Fundamental Rules2 targets
CDR-11Data Minimization
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal
URY-1Fundamental Right (Article 1)
CDR-6IT and Security Requirements

Chapter II — Protection of National Cybersecurity(4 mappings)

Art.10Critical Information Infrastructure
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
Art.12Security Incident Response3 targets
CDR-12Breach Notification
NDB-DATA-BREACH-PLANData breach response plan
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-02Violation Reporting

Chapter III — Prevention of Cyberspace Violations(2 mappings)

Art.16Purpose Limitation2 targets
CDR-11Data Minimization
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal

Chapter IV — Cybersecurity for Information Systems(3 mappings)

Art.25Cybersecurity Risk Assessment3 targets
EAR-COMP-01Export Compliance Programme
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM
HBNR-ENF-01Record-Keeping Requirements

+6 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) comparisons

Other Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) and Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)?

Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) has 36 controls across its framework, while Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (39% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter I — General Provisions, where 8 Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) controls have no direct Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) equivalent.

How many controls map between Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) and Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)?

Of 36 total Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) controls, 14 map directly to Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls — representing 39% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) to Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)?

22 Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) controls have no direct equivalent in Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter I — General Provisions with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) and Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter I — General Provisions (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.