Cross-Framework Mapping

US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory FrameworkvsEU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)

See exactly how US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework controls map to EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

25
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework maps to EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) with 20% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Compliance and Enforcement(14 mappings)

EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance
Art. 89Right to privacy in video surveillance at work
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-01Supervisory Framework3 targets
EU-MICA-CI-01White Paper Requirements
MICA-ART16ART Authorization Requirement
MICA-ART59CASP Authorization Requirement
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-02Supply Chain and SBOM2 targets
MICA-ART34ART Governance
MICA-ART81Advice and Portfolio Management
US-ITAR-EAR-CE-03Penalties3 targets
MICA-ART16ART Authorization Requirement
MICA-ART48EMT Authorization
MICA-ART59CASP Authorization Requirement
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting5 targets
Art. 91Prohibition of market manipulation
EU-MICA-CI-01White Paper Requirements
MICA-ART70Client Asset Safekeeping
MICA-ART75Custody and Administration
MICA-ART89Prohibition of Insider Dealing

Securities Classification(6 mappings)

US-SEC-DA-SC-01Howey Test Application5 targets
Art. 91Prohibition of market manipulation
EU-MICA-CI-01White Paper Requirements
MICA-ART70Client Asset Safekeeping
MICA-ART75Custody and Administration
MICA-ART89Prohibition of Insider Dealing
US-SEC-DA-SC-02Registration Requirements
Art. 91Prohibition of market manipulation

+5 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework comparisons

Other EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework and EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)?

US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework has 41 controls across its framework, while EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 33 US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework controls have no direct EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) equivalent.

How many controls map between US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework and EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)?

Of 41 total US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework controls, 8 map directly to EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework to EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)?

33 US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework controls have no direct equivalent in EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 33 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between US SEC Digital Assets and Crypto Regulatory Framework and EU Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (33 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.