Cross-Framework Mapping

Uruguay DPLvsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia)

See exactly how Uruguay DPL controls map to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

50
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
48%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Uruguay DPL maps to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) with 48% coverage across 24 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 Uruguay DPL controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Uruguay DPL: Data Subject Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 50 mapped controls across 13 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

Data Subject Rights(7 mappings)

UY-DPL-04Data Subject Rights of Access3 targets
APA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
UY-DPL-05Rights of Rectification, Update, Inclusion and Suppression3 targets
APA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
UY-DPL-18Habeas Data Procedure
APA-18Regular security testing and assessment

Uruguay DPL: Data Collection & Consent(6 mappings)

UY-DPL-04Data Subject Rights of Access3 targets
APA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
UY-DPL-05Rights of Rectification, Update, Inclusion and Suppression3 targets
APA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
APA-16Data breach notification requirements

Security(1 mappings)

UY-DPL-09Security Measures and Standards
APA-09Right to data portability

Uruguay DPL: Data Subject Rights(1 mappings)

UY-DPL-09Security Measures and Standards
APA-09Right to data portability

Risk Management(1 mappings)

UY-DPL-13Data Protection Impact Assessments
APA-13Encryption of personal data

Uruguay DPL: Data Security(4 mappings)

UY-DPL-13Data Protection Impact Assessments
APA-13Encryption of personal data
UY-DPL-15Retention and Deletion of Personal Data
APA-15Access control for personal data
UY-DPL-16Direct Marketing and Advertising2 targets
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
APA-17Security incident response procedures

+30 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 701 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 701 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Uruguay DPL and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

Uruguay DPL has 29 controls across its framework, while Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 24 overlapping controls (48% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Uruguay DPL: Data Subject Rights, where 6 Uruguay DPL controls have no direct Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between Uruguay DPL and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

Of 29 total Uruguay DPL controls, 24 map directly to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls — representing 48% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Uruguay DPL to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

26 Uruguay DPL controls have no direct equivalent in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Uruguay DPL: Data Subject Rights with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Uruguay DPL and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Uruguay DPL: Data Subject Rights (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.