Cross-Framework Mapping

Ukraine Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 2297-VI)vsFATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule

See exactly how Ukraine Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 2297-VI) controls map to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

30
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
52%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Ukraine Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 2297-VI) maps to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule with 52% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 Ukraine Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 2297-VI) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Section I - General Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Section II - Rights and Obligations(11 mappings)

Art. 10Consent Requirements2 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
Art. 7Minimum Standards2 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications
Art. 8Data Categories5 targets
Art. 12Data Ownership
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
FATF-TR-RQ-03Unhosted Wallets
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology
Art. 9Free Data Sharing2 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications

Section III - Registration and Notification(2 mappings)

Art. 12Data Ownership2 targets
PBD-IMP-01GDPR Article 25
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology

Section IV - Data Security(3 mappings)

Art. 16Data Quality3 targets
ISO-8000-IMP-01Quality Measurement
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications

Section I - General Provisions(4 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition4 targets
FATF-TR-IMP-01Technical Solutions
FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT
FATF-TR-RQ-03Unhosted Wallets
ISO-8000-IMP-03Sector Applications

+10 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Ukraine Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 2297-VI) comparisons

Other FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Ukraine Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 2297-VI) and FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?

Ukraine Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 2297-VI) has 21 controls across its framework, while FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Section I - General Provisions, where 3 Ukraine Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 2297-VI) controls have no direct FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule equivalent.

How many controls map between Ukraine Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 2297-VI) and FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?

Of 21 total Ukraine Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 2297-VI) controls, 11 map directly to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Ukraine Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 2297-VI) to FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?

10 Ukraine Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 2297-VI) controls have no direct equivalent in FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule. The highest concentration of gaps is in Section I - General Provisions with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Ukraine Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 2297-VI) and FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule?

The domain with the highest gap count is Section I - General Provisions (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.