UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code)vsPEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System
See exactly how UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) controls map to PEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) maps to PEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System with 11% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) controls identifies 34 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 1,113 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 4 of 4 control mappings across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 1,113 frameworks.
The 15 standards of age appropriate design – UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code)(4 mappings)
A UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) to PEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which PEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System controls your existing UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 11% in the header counts how many UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many PEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) comparisons
Other PEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 1,113 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 1,113 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) and PEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System?
UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) has 38 controls across its framework, while PEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code), where 20 UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) controls have no direct PEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System equivalent.
How many controls map between UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) and PEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System?
Of 38 total UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) controls, 4 map directly to PEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System controls, representing 11% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) to PEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System?
34 UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) controls have no direct equivalent in PEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System. The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) with 20 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) and PEGI - Pan European Game Information Age Rating System?
The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – UK Age Appropriate Design Code (Children's Code) (20 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are judged interpretations, grounded in the source text of both frameworks, and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.