Cross-Framework Mapping

SWIFT CSPvsBCBS 239

See exactly how SWIFT CSP controls map to BCBS 239. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

37
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
60%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SWIFT CSP maps to BCBS 239 with 60% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 SWIFT CSP controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SWIFT CSP: Information Security Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 37 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

SWIFT CSP: Information Security Governance(4 mappings)

SWIFT-03Risk appetite and tolerance for IT risk3 targets
BCBS239-03Risk appetite and tolerance for IT risk
BCBS239-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
BCBS239-19Concentration risk management
SWIFT-05Roles and responsibilities definition
BCBS239-05Roles and responsibilities definition

SWIFT CSP: Cybersecurity Controls(5 mappings)

SWIFT-06Network security and segmentation
BCBS239-06Network security and segmentation
SWIFT-07Endpoint protection and detection
BCBS239-07Endpoint protection and detection
SWIFT-08Application security controls
BCBS239-08Application security controls
SWIFT-09Encryption and key management
BCBS239-09Encryption and key management
SWIFT-10Secure configuration standards
BCBS239-10Secure configuration standards

SWIFT CSP: Operational Resilience(11 mappings)

SWIFT-11Business continuity planning and testing5 targets
BCBS239-11Business continuity planning and testing
BCBS239-12Disaster recovery procedures
BCBS239-13Third-party dependency management
BCBS239-14Critical service identification
BCBS239-15Communication and escalation procedures
SWIFT-12Disaster recovery procedures5 targets
BCBS239-11Business continuity planning and testing
BCBS239-12Disaster recovery procedures
BCBS239-13Third-party dependency management
BCBS239-14Critical service identification
BCBS239-15Communication and escalation procedures
SWIFT-15Communication and escalation procedures
BCBS239-13Third-party dependency management

+17 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SWIFT CSP and BCBS 239?

SWIFT CSP has 25 controls across its framework, while BCBS 239 covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (60% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SWIFT CSP: Information Security Governance, where 3 SWIFT CSP controls have no direct BCBS 239 equivalent.

How many controls map between SWIFT CSP and BCBS 239?

Of 25 total SWIFT CSP controls, 15 map directly to BCBS 239 controls — representing 60% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SWIFT CSP to BCBS 239?

10 SWIFT CSP controls have no direct equivalent in BCBS 239. The highest concentration of gaps is in SWIFT CSP: Information Security Governance with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SWIFT CSP and BCBS 239?

The domain with the highest gap count is SWIFT CSP: Information Security Governance (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.