Cross-Framework Mapping

SWIFT CSCFvsMAS TRM

See exactly how SWIFT CSCF controls map to MAS TRM. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

35
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SWIFT CSCF maps to MAS TRM with 36% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 SWIFT CSCF controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 35 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.

Restrict Internet Access and Protect Critical Systems(2 mappings)

1.2Operating System Privileged Account Control
MAS-TRM-05Roles and responsibilities definition
1.3Virtualisation Platform Protection
MAS-TRM-05Roles and responsibilities definition

SWIFT CSCF: Information Security Governance(4 mappings)

SWIFT-CSCF-03Risk appetite and tolerance for IT risk3 targets
MAS-TRM-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
MAS-TRM-19Concentration risk management
MAS-TRM-20Exit strategy and transition planning
SWIFT-CSCF-05Roles and responsibilities definition
MAS-TRM-05Roles and responsibilities definition

SWIFT CSCF: Cybersecurity Controls(5 mappings)

SWIFT-CSCF-06Network security and segmentation
MAS-TRM-06Network security and segmentation
SWIFT-CSCF-07Endpoint protection and detection
MAS-TRM-07Endpoint protection and detection
SWIFT-CSCF-08Application security controls
MAS-TRM-08Application security controls
SWIFT-CSCF-09Encryption and key management
MAS-TRM-09Encryption and key management
SWIFT-CSCF-10Secure configuration standards
MAS-TRM-10Secure configuration standards

SWIFT CSCF: Operational Resilience(9 mappings)

SWIFT-CSCF-11Business continuity planning and testing3 targets
MAS-TRM-11Business continuity planning and testing
MAS-TRM-12Disaster recovery procedures
MAS-TRM-14Critical service identification
SWIFT-CSCF-12Disaster recovery procedures3 targets
MAS-TRM-11Business continuity planning and testing
MAS-TRM-12Disaster recovery procedures
MAS-TRM-14Critical service identification
SWIFT-CSCF-14Critical service identification3 targets
MAS-TRM-11Business continuity planning and testing
MAS-TRM-12Disaster recovery procedures
MAS-TRM-14Critical service identification

+15 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 769 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 769 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SWIFT CSCF and MAS TRM?

SWIFT CSCF has 47 controls across its framework, while MAS TRM covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities, where 8 SWIFT CSCF controls have no direct MAS TRM equivalent.

How many controls map between SWIFT CSCF and MAS TRM?

Of 47 total SWIFT CSCF controls, 17 map directly to MAS TRM controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SWIFT CSCF to MAS TRM?

30 SWIFT CSCF controls have no direct equivalent in MAS TRM. The highest concentration of gaps is in Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SWIFT CSCF and MAS TRM?

The domain with the highest gap count is Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.