Cross-Framework Mapping

SWIFT CSCFvsISO 19011

See exactly how SWIFT CSCF controls map to ISO 19011. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
29
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SWIFT CSCF maps to ISO 19011 with 21% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 SWIFT CSCF controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.

Restrict Internet Access and Protect Critical Systems(7 mappings)

1.1SWIFT Environment Protection
ISO19011-15Nonconformity and corrective action
1.2Operating System Privileged Account Control3 targets
6.3Information security awareness, education and training
6.5Preparing and Distributing Audit Report
6.7Conducting Audit Follow-up
1.3Virtualisation Platform Protection3 targets
6.3Information security awareness, education and training
6.5Preparing and Distributing Audit Report
6.7Conducting Audit Follow-up

Physically Secure the Environment(2 mappings)

3.1Physical Security2 targets
5.3Determining and Evaluating Audit Programme Risks
ISO19011-15Nonconformity and corrective action

Prevent Compromise of Credentials(2 mappings)

4.1Password Policy
5.3Determining and Evaluating Audit Programme Risks
4.2Multi-Factor Authentication
5.3Determining and Evaluating Audit Programme Risks

Detect Anomalous Activity to Systems or Transaction Records(1 mappings)

6.4Logging and Monitoring
6.5Preparing and Distributing Audit Report

Plan for Incident Response and Information Sharing(1 mappings)

7.1Cyber Incident Response Planning
5.3Determining and Evaluating Audit Programme Risks

SWIFT CSCF: Information Security Governance(3 mappings)

SWIFT-CSCF-05Roles and responsibilities definition3 targets
6.3Information security awareness, education and training
6.5Preparing and Distributing Audit Report
6.7Conducting Audit Follow-up

SWIFT CSCF: Cybersecurity Controls(2 mappings)

SWIFT-CSCF-09Encryption and key management2 targets
6.6Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
6.7Conducting Audit Follow-up

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 769 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SWIFT CSCF and ISO 19011?

SWIFT CSCF has 47 controls across its framework, while ISO 19011 covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities, where 8 SWIFT CSCF controls have no direct ISO 19011 equivalent.

How many controls map between SWIFT CSCF and ISO 19011?

Of 47 total SWIFT CSCF controls, 10 map directly to ISO 19011 controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SWIFT CSCF to ISO 19011?

37 SWIFT CSCF controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 19011. The highest concentration of gaps is in Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SWIFT CSCF and ISO 19011?

The domain with the highest gap count is Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.