Cross-Framework Mapping

Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218)vsMiFID II / MiFIR

See exactly how Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) controls map to MiFID II / MiFIR. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) maps to MiFID II / MiFIR with 14% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter 3 - Special Categories of Processing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 719 frameworks | 428K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 428K+ mappings across 719 frameworks.

Chapter 1 - Introductory Provisions(11 mappings)

SWE-1Scope and Purpose5 targets
Art. 25Criminal Penalties
Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
Art. 34Notification of Personal Information Breach
Art. 58Scientific Research Data
Sec. 40Right to Object
SWE-2Relationship to GDPR6 targets
Art. 17Quality Management System
Art. 25Criminal Penalties
Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
Art. 34Notification of Personal Information Breach
Art. 58Scientific Research Data
Sec. 40Right to Object

Chapter 5 - Supervisory Authority(6 mappings)

SWE-11Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)5 targets
Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
Art. 28Notifying Authorities
Art. 34Notification of Personal Information Breach
Art. 58Scientific Research Data
Sec. 40Right to Object
SWE-12Investigatory Powers
Art. 28Notifying Authorities

Chapter 6 - Administrative Fines(3 mappings)

SWE-14Sanctions Framework3 targets
Art. 21Cooperation with Competent Authorities
Art. 28Notifying Authorities
Art.51Exercise of the power to impose administrative penalties and remedial measures

Related Comparisons

Other Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) comparisons

Other MiFID II / MiFIR comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 719 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 719 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (428K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) and MiFID II / MiFIR?

Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) has 36 controls across its framework, while MiFID II / MiFIR covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter 3 - Special Categories of Processing, where 3 Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) controls have no direct MiFID II / MiFIR equivalent.

How many controls map between Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) and MiFID II / MiFIR?

Of 36 total Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) controls, 5 map directly to MiFID II / MiFIR controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) to MiFID II / MiFIR?

31 Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) controls have no direct equivalent in MiFID II / MiFIR. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter 3 - Special Categories of Processing with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Sweden Data Protection Act (Dataskyddslag, 2018:218) and MiFID II / MiFIR?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter 3 - Special Categories of Processing (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.