Cross-Framework Mapping

SSDF (NIST)vsMITRE ATT&CK

See exactly how SSDF (NIST) controls map to MITRE ATT&CK. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

39
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
58%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SSDF (NIST) maps to MITRE ATT&CK with 58% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 SSDF (NIST) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SSDF (NIST): Communications Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

SSDF (NIST): Information Security Policies(1 mappings)

SSDF-04Roles and responsibilities definition
MITRE-04Roles and responsibilities definition

SSDF (NIST): Asset Management(10 mappings)

SSDF-06Asset inventory and ownership3 targets
MITRE-06Asset inventory and ownership
MITRE-07Acceptable use of assets
MITRE-09Asset handling procedures
SSDF-07Acceptable use of assets3 targets
MITRE-06Asset inventory and ownership
MITRE-07Acceptable use of assets
MITRE-09Asset handling procedures
SSDF-08Information classification and labeling
MITRE-08Information classification and labeling
SSDF-10Media management and disposal3 targets
MITRE-06Asset inventory and ownership
MITRE-07Acceptable use of assets
MITRE-09Asset handling procedures

SSDF (NIST): Access Control(9 mappings)

SSDF-12User access management and provisioning3 targets
MITRE-11Access control policy and enforcement
MITRE-12User access management and provisioning
MITRE-14Privileged access management
SSDF-13Authentication and password management4 targets
MITRE-11Access control policy and enforcement
MITRE-12User access management and provisioning
MITRE-13Authentication and password management
MITRE-14Privileged access management
SSDF-14Privileged access management
MITRE-14Privileged access management
SSDF-15Access review and recertification
MITRE-11Access control policy and enforcement

+19 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SSDF (NIST) and MITRE ATT&CK?

SSDF (NIST) has 31 controls across its framework, while MITRE ATT&CK covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (58% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SSDF (NIST): Communications Security, where 4 SSDF (NIST) controls have no direct MITRE ATT&CK equivalent.

How many controls map between SSDF (NIST) and MITRE ATT&CK?

Of 31 total SSDF (NIST) controls, 18 map directly to MITRE ATT&CK controls — representing 58% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SSDF (NIST) to MITRE ATT&CK?

13 SSDF (NIST) controls have no direct equivalent in MITRE ATT&CK. The highest concentration of gaps is in SSDF (NIST): Communications Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SSDF (NIST) and MITRE ATT&CK?

The domain with the highest gap count is SSDF (NIST): Communications Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.