Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea ISMS-PvsISO 27019

See exactly how South Korea ISMS-P controls map to ISO 27019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

28
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea ISMS-P maps to ISO 27019 with 40% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 South Korea ISMS-P controls identifies 15 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Personal Information Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Access Control(7 mappings)

ISMSP-AC-01Access Control Policy3 targets
ISO27019-07Personnel risk assessment
ISO27019-08Electronic access perimeter management
ISO27019-10Revocation of access procedures
ISMSP-AC-04Network Access Control4 targets
ISO27019-07Personnel risk assessment
ISO27019-08Electronic access perimeter management
ISO27019-10Revocation of access procedures
ISO27019-13Network security monitoring

Management System(3 mappings)

ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management3 targets
ISO27019-07Personnel risk assessment
ISO27019-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
ISO27019-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems

Personal Information Protection(6 mappings)

ISMSP-PI-03Third-Party Provision and Outsourcing3 targets
ISO27019-22Configuration management for OT systems
ISO27019-23Change management procedures
ISO27019-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
ISMSP-PI-06Personal Information Destruction3 targets
ISO27019-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
ISO27019-18Reporting obligations to authorities
ISO27019-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents

System and Operations Security(4 mappings)

ISMSP-SYS-01System Hardening and Patch Management3 targets
ISO27019-11Security patch management for OT
ISO27019-14System security hardening
ISO27019-22Configuration management for OT systems
ISMSP-SYS-03Security Monitoring and Log Management
ISO27019-13Network security monitoring

+8 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A South Korea ISMS-P to ISO 27019 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 27019 controls your existing South Korea ISMS-P work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

South Korea ISMS-P into ISO 27019
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO 27019 into South Korea ISMS-P
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

South Korea ISMS-P to ISO 27019 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 40% in the header counts how many South Korea ISMS-P controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 27019 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between South Korea ISMS-P and ISO 27019?

South Korea ISMS-P has 25 controls across its framework, while ISO 27019 covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Personal Information Protection, where 4 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct ISO 27019 equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea ISMS-P and ISO 27019?

Of 25 total South Korea ISMS-P controls, 10 map directly to ISO 27019 controls, representing 40% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea ISMS-P to ISO 27019?

15 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27019. The highest concentration of gaps is in Personal Information Protection with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea ISMS-P and ISO 27019?

The domain with the highest gap count is Personal Information Protection (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.