Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)vsFrench Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)

See exactly how South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls map to French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
39
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) maps to French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) with 12% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 48 South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls identifies 42 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 48 controls analysed | 716 frameworks | 430K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 430K+ mappings across 716 frameworks.

Security Controls(9 mappings)

KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management2 targets
Sapin2-Pillar3-Risk-MappingPillar 3 - Corruption Risk Mapping (Cartographie des Risques)
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)
NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs
Sapin2-Pillar1-Code-of-ConductPillar 1 - Anti-Corruption Code of Conduct
NRC73-CTL-05Supply Chain Security for CDAs
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management2 targets
Sapin2-Pillar3-Risk-MappingPillar 3 - Corruption Risk Mapping (Cartographie des Risques)
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud2 targets
Sapin2-Pillar3-Risk-MappingPillar 3 - Corruption Risk Mapping (Cartographie des Risques)
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)
PAS1192-5-SC-02Personnel Security
Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)

Related Comparisons

Other South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) comparisons

Other French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 716 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 716 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (430K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) has 48 controls across its framework, while French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 15 South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls have no direct French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?

Of 48 total South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls, 6 map directly to French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 42 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) to French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?

42 South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls have no direct equivalent in French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691). The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) and French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.