SIG (Shared Assessments)vsOpenSSF Scorecard
See exactly how SIG (Shared Assessments) controls map to OpenSSF Scorecard. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
SIG (Shared Assessments) maps to OpenSSF Scorecard with 31% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 SIG (Shared Assessments) controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SIG (Shared Assessments): Communications Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 41 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.
SIG (Shared Assessments): Information Security Policies(1 mappings)
SIG (Shared Assessments): Asset Management(10 mappings)
SIG (Shared Assessments): Access Control(9 mappings)
+21 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 720 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other SIG (Shared Assessments) comparisons
Other OpenSSF Scorecard comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 720 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between SIG (Shared Assessments) and OpenSSF Scorecard?
SIG (Shared Assessments) has 54 controls across its framework, while OpenSSF Scorecard covers 51 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SIG (Shared Assessments): Communications Security, where 4 SIG (Shared Assessments) controls have no direct OpenSSF Scorecard equivalent.
How many controls map between SIG (Shared Assessments) and OpenSSF Scorecard?
Of 54 total SIG (Shared Assessments) controls, 17 map directly to OpenSSF Scorecard controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping SIG (Shared Assessments) to OpenSSF Scorecard?
37 SIG (Shared Assessments) controls have no direct equivalent in OpenSSF Scorecard. The highest concentration of gaps is in SIG (Shared Assessments): Communications Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between SIG (Shared Assessments) and OpenSSF Scorecard?
The domain with the highest gap count is SIG (Shared Assessments): Communications Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.