Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)vsCritical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023
See exactly how Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls map to Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) maps to Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 with 30% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 30 Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Critical Infrastructure Sectors.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 30 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Part 2A - Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP)(12 mappings)
Part 2B - Notification of Cyber Security Incidents(4 mappings)
Part 2C - Enhanced Cyber Security Obligations (Systems of National Significance)(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) comparisons
Other Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) and Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023?
Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) has 30 controls across its framework, while Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Critical Infrastructure Sectors, where 11 Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls have no direct Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 equivalent.
How many controls map between Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) and Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023?
Of 30 total Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls, 9 map directly to Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023 controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) to Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023?
21 Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls have no direct equivalent in Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in Critical Infrastructure Sectors with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) and Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 2023?
The domain with the highest gap count is Critical Infrastructure Sectors (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.