Cross-Framework Mapping

RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in PropertyvsNew Hampshire Privacy Act

See exactly how RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property controls map to New Hampshire Privacy Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
42%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property maps to New Hampshire Privacy Act with 42% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Valuation Technology Standards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Data Standards and Interoperability(6 mappings)

Art. 7Minimum Standards
NH-PA-09Right to data portability
Art. 8Data Categories3 targets
NH-PA-13Encryption of personal data
NH-PA-15Access control for personal data
NH-PA-22Privacy by design and default
Art. 9Free Data Sharing
NH-PA-09Right to data portability
RICS-DT-1.2Data Portability and Comparability
NH-PA-09Right to data portability

Data Governance and Security(3 mappings)

RICS-DT-3.2Data Quality Assurance3 targets
NH-PA-19Data protection officer designation
NH-PA-21Data protection impact assessments
NH-PA-22Privacy by design and default

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property and New Hampshire Privacy Act?

RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property has 12 controls across its framework, while New Hampshire Privacy Act covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (42% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Valuation Technology Standards, where 3 RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property controls have no direct New Hampshire Privacy Act equivalent.

How many controls map between RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property and New Hampshire Privacy Act?

Of 12 total RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property controls, 5 map directly to New Hampshire Privacy Act controls — representing 42% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property to New Hampshire Privacy Act?

7 RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property controls have no direct equivalent in New Hampshire Privacy Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Valuation Technology Standards with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between RICS Professional Standards — Data and Technology in Property and New Hampshire Privacy Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is Valuation Technology Standards (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.